Twitter users mock PETA for speaking out against use of animal-based insults

A Tweeter through People for the ethical treatment of animals, this week, called on people to stop using “speciesist” terms such as “chicken”, “pig” or “rat” as insults to humans.

This Tweeter sparked a storm of negative responses.

According to a New York Post report, the PETA Tweet was so widely ridiculed online that on Thursday morning it garnered an “embarrassing ratio of almost 11,000 comments to just over 3,000 likes.”

“Treating someone an animal like an insult reinforces the myth that humans are superior to other animals and justified in raping them,” the animal rights group said in its call to action. “Defend justice by rejecting supremacist language”, Tweeter mentionned.

the New York Post drew attention to a chart of PETA social media representatives included in the tweet, which lists “human ‘supremacist’ terminology and suggests alternative language such as the use of ‘cowardly’ instead of ‘chicken’, ‘lively’ instead of ‘rat’, ‘jerk’ rather than ‘snake’, ‘loathsome’ rather than ‘pig’ and ‘lazy’ to slander someone with tendencies to laziness.

What was the response?

Most commentators viewed PETA’s request as a bit absurd, the report mentionned.

“Congratulations on the dumbest tweet of 2021 and it’s only been 4 weeks,” made fun of an attacker. “A real success.”

the New York Post quoted several other tweets responding to PETA’s call:

“I can’t tell if this is real or if you are making fun of yourselves,” wrote another.

A catty commenter posted a graphic that said, “Instead of ‘PETA’, say ‘trash’.”

the report noted that “even staunch vegans found PETA’s tweet hard to digest.”

“This is my 7th year of being a vegan and I beg you never to tweet again” wrote a dismayed herbivore.

Another “correctly pointed out that the lazy were named after the term laziness and not the other way around.

PETA argued with a response.

PETA responded to the reaction with a follow-up tweet however, the language “speciesist” was also “inaccurate” because animals have attributes surprisingly similar to humans.

“Pigs, for example, are intelligent, lead complex social lives, and empathize with other pigs in distress,” PETA wrote. “Snakes are intelligent, have family relationships and prefer to associate with those close to them.”

the New York Post quoted a stakeholder who, in response to PETA’s argument, retort, “Come back to me about being less superior than the animals when an anteater builds a house.”


About Anne Wurtsbach

Check Also

Goals for Norwich City forwards Sinani and Drmic

Danel Sinani’s return to form continued with a goal and victory with loaner club Waasland-Beveren, …